General
Editor
A Survey of Presbyterian Mission History in Africa
Macnutt
has done it! He has authored a major-length thriller trilogy with unique
sub-genres and for this he deserves sincere congratulations. This is no minor
feat. Literally a lifetime in the making for such a work as this trilogy.
Trilogies
as literary works are not easy to produce. As one reviews just what a trilogy
is I check off the list against Macnutt’s Connection trilogy.
So, I start with my essentials for a trilogy. Good trilogies must allow each of
the three books to be distinct yet at the same time well bonded as a whole,
showing unity and coherence. Each book must not repeat itself, beyond the
obvious necessities for ease of reading, yet at the same time must develop and
show growth progressively from book to book. Good trilogies have a winsome
appeal about themselves and entertain the reader and cause them
to enjoy and take pleasure in the experience of reading these massive
sized trilogical books. In essence a trilogy can be summed up in three words,
beginning, middle, and end, with the seeds caste in the first, the beginning,
and grow in the second, the middle, and reach logical climax in the final, the
end. Good trilogies follow enough main characters that the reader is not
overwhelmed. Good trilogies develop crisis with the endings but without full resolution
especially in books one and two, so that there is always that sense of
anticipation, more is yet to come, and things are not resolved or complete yet.
That point then leads us to the final book in the trilogy series where the
reader is satisfied and not left wondering, is the author coming back
with a sequel fourth volume. The trick of a good trilogy is to resolve and
satisfy yet create just some mystique at the end of the trilogy that the door
opens a little to the future but without the need for a fourth book.
Our
world has been enthralled by the Tolkien trilogy series Lord of the
Rings, with its prefatory work on the hobbits. Macnutt, not writing in the
same literary-styled work as Tolkien did, does much the same for structure. The
trilogy of the Connection is clear, yet Five Dollars a
Day is somewhat a prefatory work to it yet not as I have said before
totally necessary to read first. I just say this and make this parallel as it
establishes the place of trilogy in the popular culture of our day.
Now
having made my review of a good trilogy how does Macnutt fair, after all he is
a lawyer and one with a professional background of being judged so all is fair
here. As a series there is good unity of story line, threaded throughout. Good
character development and the feel that one knows the characters. The main two
characters Isaac Menshive and William MacIntosh provide that unity of plot line
and character development from book to book. In book three, two significant
characters are developed and ordinarily this may not work in a trilogy, but the
author has crafted it so carefully through family relationships that it can be
pulled-off, it works. I do not want to give away too much here on names. Each
book in the series is distinct and its own yet well crafted as a set for unity.
The reader is winsomely entertained in all three books and proper resolutions
are made yet appropriate questions are left at the end of books one and two. As
a trilogy I personally thought it was well done and is worthy of being classified
as a trilogy.
Clearly
the author is not lazy but has done his background work. There is a consistent
level of exacting research and attention to detail by the author in all three
volumes. One often comes away with a personal feel that one has been there as
the description is carefully crafted. In volume three, The 9/11
Connection, let me give some examples. The author’s descriptors of scenes
set at the National Gallery, Trafalgar Square and the Sainsbury Wing and at the
Wallace Collection, London make one want to return or go there. Details are
picked up which makes this book more than an ordinary thriller, one is being
educated all along the way on very important cultural centres, collections,
architectural styes and details, the decorative arts and also to a lesser
extend on music. It makes reading the book take on two or more levels of
reading all at once. There is the plot-line of the characters rooted in
cultural worlds which are worthy of reflection in themselves, but this is
combined with attention to travelogue and interest well beyond travel guides
and takes us to art, culture, and on occasion language, music and not to
mention extensive forays into law, economics, international relations and of
course psychology and crime. Volume three brings us very much into our present
world of Russia and the Ukraine and the author develops a plot with fascinating
conjectures introduced (some may even say conspiracy theories!) that make for
very fascinating reading without me spilling too much here. I sometimes
wondered if the author were an intense student of psychology but perhaps it is
the lawyer’s mind at work and one which has a deep grasp of human nature.
Although the sixth sense is there in the character Will MacIntosh (p. 137) so
maybe that is part of the author’s secret to the world of understanding and
perception.
For
those familiar with Macnutt’s other books one will find interesting parallels
again in this final volume. Macnutt’s work on furniture and comments on rooms
in houses brings a smile (p.294) and makes one see that his writing builds one
stone upon another and he can cross genres and topics with integration.
Of
the three volumes in this “Connection” series, my first preferences were with
volumes one and two. That does not mean that volume three was not of interest,
it was a little too long for me and I felt it could have been shortened and
thus not as gripping for me as a reader. I realise that crosses into the world
of the subjective and some others may disagree with that critique. Trilogies
are not easy to write and sustain unity of development and attention. I think
for myself the test is always in the final third volume. The trilogy does not
unravel and fall apart. No, it holds together and resolves many questions which
a reader has and tries to come up with one’s own answers. Some may have seen it
coming, but I cannot say that exactly in the way that it was resolved. Does the
author allow a door for a fourth volume? Maybe, but not necessarily needed and
that for me is best. In reviewing trilogies, it is often discussion of the
final book and the ending which feature. Here the subjective and objective
combine and I suspect there may be a variety of final assessments on the
ending.
Congratulations
to the author on a truly Herculean feat in writing this trilogy. Years of
discipline in the writing craft have gone into this trilogy and few would
attempt such a feat.
Post Views : 161